Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHIME Charter Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Consensus seems to be that this middle school is not notable, but that it could be mentioned in a (to-be-created) article on the CHIME Institute. Randykitty (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

CHIME Charter Middle School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:ORG SarahStierch (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep pending time to properly source-hunt. This smells notable to me. :-) -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The middle school is not notable and has only existed since 2003. But its parent, the CHIME Institute, might be notable if the history given at the article is accurate. Searching mostly turns up a K-12 (?) entity called the CHIME Institute's Schwarzenegger Community. I could find no indication what its history is, or what its connection is with the middle school or the Institute. If we can't find more information and get a properly sourced and accurate article, this should be Deleted. I am open to changing my mind if someone can come up with a better article and a proposed rename. --MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern   Antarctica   ₵  02:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - Parsing the Google, my sense is that the middle school is not notable but the institute behind it probably is. Carrite (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.