Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CIA and USA Involvement in the Guatemalan Revolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 14:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

CIA and USA Involvement in the Guatemalan Revolution

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Partisan fork of 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état. Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 22:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No merge or redirect either. Blueboy96 23:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand: Article has plenty of references from reliable sources. Partisan? See WP:BIAS: "Despite the many contributions of Wikipedians writing in English as a non-native language, the English Wikipedia is dominated by native English-speaking editors from Anglophone countries. These Anglophone countries tend to be industrialized, thereby accentuating the encyclopedia's bias to contributions from First World countries." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmundo (talk • contribs) 23:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This has nothing to do with whether or not the article creator is a native speaker. Please stop spamming AfD pages with irrelevant comments. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 23:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The WP:Bias policy is about the world wide perspective that Wikipedia should have. Many wikipedia articles are written from the bias of the industrialized countries, see WP:Bias.--Jmundo (talk) 00:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV fork. Jmundo's concern about bias appears misplaced, and even if true, creating an article like this is not the way to counter it. -- Zim Zala Bim talk  05:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Why did you replace the link to 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état (of which this article is a fork) with an article about copyright complaints to Google? - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:56, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * For the life of me, I have no idea how that happened. Certainly wasn't purposeful, and glad you reverted my erroneous keystrokes. -- Zim Zala Bim talk  04:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. However, there may be some salvagable information to plug in main article. Yanksox (talk) 04:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Even the article title is strange. Wikipedia is not a good place for essays. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.