Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CIMsystem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 14:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

CIMsystem

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Was a contested speedy, so bringing to AfD. Lacks third-party non-trivial coverage in the article, but I can see a few web resources like and  that might allow for an encyclopedia article. Ghits = ~1500. Google Scholar results look promising. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 16:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - article about a software business; makes no showing of notability, and the links given go to company websites. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I examined the 15 Scholar results, but only 1 appears to truly mention CIMsystem. The remainder seem to be results for "CIM system", which probably appear as "CIMsystem" due to OCR usage (see results by Hancke, Jardim-Goncalves et al., Ragowsky & Stern (x 2), Islam et al., Sarkis & Lin, Ari & Hoang, Canfield & Nair, which all appear to be OCR errors). I suspect that the remaining results, which I cannot examine, are the result of a similar error. Of the two websites listed, one appears to be restricted to products produced by the company (i.e., not about the company) while the second (a source supplied by a partner of the company) asserts little notability. --Lox (t,c) 08:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know that OCR can do that when trying to recognise printed text, but I wasn't sure exactly what "CIM" meant, other than the vuglar usage.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I believe that in the cases above, CIM refers to Computer Integrated Manufacturing (I have corrected the link above) --Lox (t,c) 11:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable company. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.