Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CINE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

CINE

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not see sufficient evidence of this award's notability to warrant an article. The references given do not support the claim: the first is to "Idealist", which is a company description written by the company; the second is to a yellow pages listing (which also doesn't happen to mention the company); the third reference does not contain a link— that would be fine, but I could not find evidence of that reference's existence, never mind what it might say about CINE; the fourth also contains no link and then also does not appear to exist; the fifth, sixth, and seventh lack independence; the eighth and ninth also contain no links, and for the second time I could not verify their existence— the Judith Havemann article MIGHT have made a case for notability, but I could not find her name mentioned with the word "CINE" anywhere except in this article; the tenth, eleventh, and twelfth all fail independence (the list of "notable winners" derives entirely from the 12th source— and while the list of such people may be accurate, that does not make the award notable any more than if I gave an award to every best actress ever to win an Oscar and then claimed I was notable for having done so). KDS4444 (talk) 08:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as its age and history suggests there's enough including archived to find better information, my searches found a few and this will still need better attention. SwisterTwister   talk  00:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)




 * Keep per the organization and its awards having the coverage to meet WP:N and WP:ORG. as  states, this needs work, not deletion.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 16:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - CINE is a widely known org in the doc cinema field and beyond; and well regarded -- It would be silly to delete the article -- Luigibob (talk) 00:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.