Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CITYpeek (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  11:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

CITYpeek
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. Passing mentions in local sources only. – Teratix ₵ 16:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Travel and tourism, Websites,  and Maryland. – Teratix ₵ 16:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Previously brought to AFD, not eligible for a Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neither in the cited sources nor anywhere else that I have seen is there any substantial coverage in independent sources. JBW (talk) 11:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: For an article to meet WP:BASICS, it needs to have a strong context supported with reliable sources per WP:RS or then, we aren't arguing. GNG must be met before looking at WP:NCORP, an adittional criteria for various SNGs. The product isn't notable. Pls delete! Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 10:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.