Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, an indiscriminate list that is better referenced outside of WP --Steve (Stephen)talk 05:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NOT, causes problems for many users due to its size (266kb) Will (talk) 21:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - is part of greater series of articles/lists on unicode characters. If the only reason to delete is article size, split is the answer. Wl219 22:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete (or move to somewhere outside of wikipedia) - as it's just a huge unlinked list of characters it seems to break the IINFO rule, although I suppose having a unicode reference might be useful to some people (although for those without estoric fonts the Unicode people's own PDFs at http://www.unicode.org/charts/ are probably more useful), could it be moved to Wikisource or something? FredOrAlive 18:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - This was originally a subpage of List of Unicode characters, but someone moved it outside. While I don't think it should be an independent article either, merging it into the main article would cause slowdown or crash problems on older computers. The main article, by the way, is subject to a merge discussion (which is more of a deletion discussion, since the information will be gone according to the merge discussion) - if the decision is to get rid of the main article, all the (former) subpages can go too (although I'd like to have a notice so I can backup the articles - they could prove useful for the german List of Unicode characters) -- Prince Kassad 20:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete link to it outside of wiki if there's something relevant on it (per FredOrAlive) Giggy  UCP 00:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.