Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ International House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

CJ International House

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not separately notable enough for its own article imo; no academic or news mentions i can find about it. toobigtokale (talk) 16:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  20:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete College dormitories definately don't meet WP:Geoland Run of the mill place that doesn't merit an article WP:run-of-the-millJames.folsom (talk) 23:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG - no sources given for why this place is notable. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete This is one of those articles which could be re-written to be notable if any additional sourcing exists, but given the language barrier I'm not sure if it does. SportingFlyer  T · C  07:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.