Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Korea Express


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 15:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

CJ Korea Express

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable delivery company, Can only find mentions, Fails NCORP & GNG – Davey 2010 Talk 20:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as blatant as it gets for advertising and our policies delete it by this alone. SwisterTwister   talk  01:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, the article is entirely unsourced, but the company is South Korea's largest logistics company (this is somethign equivalent to DHL and FedEx). This is one of the articles which is worth saving. The company is 86 years old. See some of the sources
 * Bloomberg CJ Korea Express to Expand Into China to Grow Overseas Networks
 * Korea Joongang Daily CJ Korex pursues joint venture in Philippines, How technology is transforming logistics (brief mention), CJ Korea Express eyes use of self-flying drones (this looks like redressed PR though)
 * Korea Times CJ Korea Express buys Malaysian logistics company (source is about a routine acquisition though)
 * Yonhap CJ Korea Express sets up biz tieup with Chinese delivery firm (not useful for WP:CORPIND though, as it is reprinting what the company says), CJ Korea Express buys Malaysian logistics company (routine merge news)
 * The sources are not great here (and most wouldn't pass WP:CORPIND and WP:CORPDEPTH). But considering that this is the largest logistics provided, I think there are definitely sources in Korean which would be adequate to write an article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Purely promotional. Article lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. G-searches are turning up PR announcements and business listings - same for the above listed sources. Unfortunately the WP Koren article (CJ 대한 통운) doesn't have any better sources either. If someone could come up with better sources I will reconsider my !vote but as it stands article fails WP:ORGCRITE and WP:GNG.  CBS 527 Talk 16:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.