Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CKKA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 10:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

CKKA

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Nominated after discussion at Martial Arts project. It appears to fail WP:GNG and I couldn't find any reliable sources. Papaursa (talk) 01:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  —Papaursa (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 03:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 03:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Hello again, Papaursa. I have added some links, but I am not entirely sure if they establish notability. I'm rather certain there's other stuff out there to find though. Silver  seren C 03:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I still don't see notability or significant coverage of the organization by independent sources. The two references are to the organization's own website and a member school.  The external links are to member schools (or in one case to a person who was made an honorary CKKA member). Papaursa (talk) 16:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete The new sources do not look like reliable sources. I think a good-faith effort has been made to find reliable sources for this small, young, two brother non-notable martial arts organisation. jmcw (talk) 12:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I searched for sources using "Canadian Karate Kung Fu Association" just now, but have not yet found anything that clearly supports notability. Janggeom (talk) 14:26, 30 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - the currnet sources do not establish notability. A quick search I did on Google failed to turn up anything more substantial. Tzu Zha Men (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.