Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLARION (cognitive architecture)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Martial BACQUET 23:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

CLARION (cognitive architecture)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotional. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 21:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helies (talk • contribs) — Helies (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. see an article in another online encyclopedia: http://www.calt.insead.edu/Encyclopedia/index.php?pagename=cognitive%20architectures
 * Delete per WP:N; nowhere near notable unless sources are provided.  NA SC AR Fan 24 (radio me!) 22:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions.   —Pete.Hurd 03:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Barring sources coming up in AFD. • Lawrence Cohen  04:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are several sources linking to the CLARION cognitive architecture. In addition to a list of about 50 peer-reviewed journal articles in top journals in artificial intelligence and psychology (http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/~rsun/clarion-pub.html), CLARION is referred to in the Soar (cognitive architecture) entry and the cognitive architecture entry. Also, it has been debated in an international symposium in Stanford University (http://www.isle.org/symposia/cogarch/archabs.html).
 * keep Per Helies (who may be an SPA, but whose point seems irrefutable) peer reviewed publications & book of CLARION papers by numerous authors, published by Cambridge University Press. Seems as encyclopedic as any other cognitive architecture. Pete.Hurd 14:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. CLARION is a cognitive model comparable to ACT-R and Soar, both of which are listed in wikipedia. To see its notability, also consult cognitive scientists who work in this area.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.121.174 (talk) 14:53, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - appears to be notable. Wikidemo 14:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable:

see an objective, third-party academic review of CLARION: http://www.ai.rug.nl/~niels/publications/architectures.pdf

see also: http://cll.stanford.edu/~langley/papers/arch.aimag.pdf

see also: http://sitemaker.umich.edu/soarweb/cognitive_architecture_sites_around_the_country

and simply do a Google search on "CLARION cognitive architecture" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.113.89.45 (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.