Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLC (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 08:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

CLC (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Only one secondary source listed even approaches reliable; the rest are the usual kpop gossip/promo machine. This group first record was just released 3 days ago. They've only been on one TV show as a group and it was self-produced on their agency's own youtube channel. The user who created this article frequently creates articles for non-notable singers, albums, and songs. This is WP:CRYSTAL, WP:TOO SOON, etc. Shinyang-i (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shinyang-i (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep I'll expand the article however the reason why some sources are unreliable is because most sources that talk about Kpop are Korean and the only webpages who translate Kpop content are gossip news (like Allkpop) if you want I will include Korean news sites talking about them however it will be in Korean. The group are new but they will release more music so it would be useless to delete it now and in a few months someone has to create it again. (User:4minute lover (talk) 14:50, 23 March 2015‎ (UTC))


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete per nom. Not useless at all for someone have to recreate the article, either. Always best to wait until reliable sources indicating notability are found. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 18:34, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * keep first article (improvement article request) is enough and no need to delete (Pikhmikh (talk) 10:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC))

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * delete / move it Put it back in the drafts section would be my first choice. While I do like the group and believe they will gain the notability needed for this page to be made eventually.... Right now I think it is to early for them to have their own page if the sources are not there yet.  If you need to do more work on it to bring it up to the minmum standards then it's not ready yet for the mainspace.Peachywink (talk) 03:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy per Peachywink. Fails WP:BAND for now. WP:TOOSOON at best. Dai Pritchard (talk) 07:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * keep article is still expanding and more and more info is becoming available. They only debuted recently so it will be a bit before we have more sources. Ratizi  Angelou  contribs 22:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.