Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLE International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Editis. Consensus is that the article cannot meet the notability guideline, but a redirect to the parent company Editis is appropriate. Davewild (talk) 19:27, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

CLE International

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I'm nominating this page for deletion. It doesn't seem to meet the "Sources" criterion for notability. It was marked for lack of sources two years ago and no independent sources have been added. Trackley (talk) 17:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge - Although the article that this should merge with (Editis]) is also in the same shape as this article, there is a small minute bit of notability. The problem is the sourcing of the notability. Just because a reference is not contained in the article does not mean that it does not meet notability guidelines. However, I do agree that since no one has done any editing to improve it in over 2 years that the standalone article is not needed (obviously not notable enough for others to improve for Wikipedia). However, I still feel that is should be listed for [[Editis and maybe a redirect to that page would be better? (Yes, I ended my comment with a question). --Morning277 (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Editis. Unreferenced article, consisting largely of a book list. No evidence of distinct notability in either this or the equivalent French article, so best redirected to the parent company. AllyD (talk) 19:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.