Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLIP (protein)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The protein is indeed notable, however, it just appears that the references are not included within the article (but do exist). I recommend that they be added in order to help prevent confusion regarding nomination. sums it up well. The article needs references added (they exist), not deletion. Please do see WP:BEFORE when making nominations. If you have any questions about this or object to my close, please do feel free to message me on my talk page (and please remain civil, I will respond to your message as soon as possible). (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

CLIP (protein)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dicdef, untouched since 2006. Appears to not meet WP:GNG. Coin945 (talk) 05:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 05:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - a description of a protein's structure and function is certainly not a dictionary definition. There are reliable papers about these aspects, such as in myeloid leukemia and in MHC antigen processing. CLIP modulates immune responses, sitting in the MHC's peptide binding site. And so forth. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - needs refs but those are just unused, not nonexistent. Text body is fine for a short treatement of a protein. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. aneedsreferences, not deletion. See WP:BEFORE.  DGG ( talk ) 10:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.