Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMSformE

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Stormie 09:29, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)

CMSformE
This page appears have been added by the software's author as a means to promote his software, rather than to inform. Since its addition no attempt has been made to transform the article into something encyclopaedic, since no-one on the wikipedia apart from the author[s] know anything about this software. Pti 14:52, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Abstain but I notice it seems to bring a fair amount of relevant information on Google, suggesting notability. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 15:09, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * The information on google is all a result of the authors' promotion. There doesn't seem to be anything not there as a result of the authors' own actions. Pti 15:23, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an article, promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 15:40, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Come back when the product is in 1.0 and enough people use it to make it notable. According to SF.net, this project is in planning to beta. It's too early for an article (if ever). Inter 16:00, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertisement, no evidence of notability. There seems to be some disagreement about the exact nature of the product (disgruntled user maybe? Or rival supplier?), but delete it either way. Andrewa 17:59, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)