Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMX Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Non-admin closure, article was speedily deleted by DGG under criteria A7 (notability). Article title salted. GregJackP  Boomer!   04:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

CMX Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable. Fails WP:CORP. 2 GNews hits, both trivial mentions, no WP:RS in GHits. A7 CSD tag removed 9 times by page creator and IP. GregJackP  Boomer!   00:50, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Not notable at all, fails WP:COMPANY. Ranked 2,603 on the Inc. 5000. As mentioned above, CSD tag removed multiple times without explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsFionnuala (talk • contribs) 00:55, 25 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and MsFionnuala; possibly Speedy delete per db-corp. — Hue  Sat  Lum  01:07, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 25 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - article makes no assertion of importance. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 03:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: FWIW, the AfD tag has now been removed twice by User:Cgcastleman. MsFionnuala (talk) 11:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, db-corp. Hairhorn (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - I nominated this for A7 when I first saw it on NPP. The author (both logged in and editing as IP) removed the CSD template several times without explanation. The article makes no claims to significance, and the two sources are just the the lamest of database entries you'll find. There's nothing here to argue about, it's a clear A7. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 21:24, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I would prefer not a speedy, in view of the threats to repost until we follow our own rules. If this is AfD deleted, we can follow our rules and G4 it... Peridon (talk) 21:43, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I've just looked at the two references. One is a mention of the company's name in a list that goes on and on and on. The other is a profile. We don't usually count profiles as reliable independent sources because very often they rely on company supplied information, and also because they often, as here, are of the order of 'BloggsCo is a company making synchronised crange pins based in Little Whinging'. Peridon (talk) 22:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - I concur with Peridon and would prefer delete over speedy in view of creator's repost comments.  GregJackP   Boomer!   23:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.