Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMiC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 22:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

CMiC

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. The only result on Gnews that wasn't PR was a single mention in a trade publication. What sources exist on the page are mostly either wildly inappropriate (a link to a WP page), wildly vague (simply linking to the homepage of a company mentioned), or primary. The tone of the article is promotional. OSbornarfcontribs. 02:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm inclined to call Speedy Delete on account of spam,but they aren't actually selling anything, are they? Due to the promotional nature, however, I'm calling Delete for this one.  Major WP:NPOV issues. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 02:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * DELETE - This article is spam. =//= Johnny Squeaky 06:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 06:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete: Unambiguous advertisement for another back office software business. Google News suggests a possibly notable CMIC, but that apparently is a medical concern and this is something else entirely.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:21, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * DELETE - I know several companies working in this industry sector. CMIC is not a leading player, and the lack of reliable references underlines this. And the promotional tone is wrong. - Paul W (talk) 23:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.