Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COCORIOKO Newspaper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Leeroy Wilfred Kabs-Kanu. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

COCORIOKO Newspaper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local newspaper with no reliable third party sources found. Tinton5 (talk) 16:36, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:39, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Searching in Google Books, and Google News, it appears that there are enough reliable sources that have cited this agency. That makes it notable. desmay (talk) 19:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Leeroy Wilfred Kabs-Kanu, as the newspaper fails the general notability guideline, and Kabs-Kanu is the sole owner, financier, publisher and Chief Executive Officer, and appears to be the primary writer (also a person of questionable notability himself, as most coverage of the newspaper and Mr. Kabs-Kanu seems to come from Cocoriokoko itself or The Patriotic Vanguard, of which Kabs-Kanu is (or at least was) affiliated).  Very scant coverage of the newspaper or its owner in reliable sources.  And  FYI, having a handful of articles cited does not make a publication notable, it merely indicates existence. Per the general notability guideline We generally need need significant independent coverage about a subject, not trivial tangential references indicating that a subject exists. Notability is not inherited by association with other more notable entities. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Is Nutin (talk) 14:46, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect Per --Animalparty! norm.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.