Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COGIATI (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 23:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

COGIATI
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about an unscientific gender test that is mainly based on prejudices and POV, there's no evidence that this test is used by professionals. --Eva K. is evil 14:47, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 15:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No evidence that anyone other than the author uses this test. Darrenhusted (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced pseudoscience, not notable (not even notable as pseudoscience). Hairhorn (talk) 16:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)\
 * Weak keep. Sourced to the COGIATI website, which may be the only friendly source; the links to hostile reviews seem reasonably reflected in the text. It may welll be notable as pseudo-science; and such articles are a public service. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I still consider it unsourced; the COGIATI website falls squarely into the camp of sources not independent from the subject. If it's the "only friendly source" that doesn't bode well for the credibility of the test. Hairhorn (talk) 15:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.