Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CONCEPT 5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

CONCEPT 5

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

This article concerns a rumored new store chain from Abercrombie & Fitch. Despite requests for sources there are none. If the nonexistent, rumored chain ever becomes an actual, notable chain then it will probably have a different name anyway. Will Beback · † · 22:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait, it has a source! A A&F staff meetin! That's good enough for me! (sarcasm). I can't see anything worth this article. WP is not a crystal ball, Delete. Dåvid ƒuchs  (talk &bull; contribs) 23:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait, you used sarcasm on an XfD page? That's unheard of! (!voting Delete per WP:Not a crystal ball, too) -- MarcoTolo 23:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per above WP:NOT comments. In addition, a staff meeting most definitely fails WP:V in every way possible. Soltak | Talk 00:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Crystalballing, etc. Not only that, but if the author was present at such a meeting, there would also be conflict of interest issues. Leebo 86 05:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. There seems to be some press for Concept 5, for example here and  here, but it certainly doesn't confirm the specific nature of the venture.  Wikipedia not being a crystal ball, it's hard to confirm notability for something that doesn't exist yet. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above (WP:CRYSTAL, WP:V, etc). robwingfield &laquo;T&bull;C&raquo; 23:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.