Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COOL

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Redirect. Golbez 23:58, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

COOL
Deadend article with 951 hits. &rarr;Ingoolemo&larr;  talk  06:02, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)


 * Keep. See:, , ,  , , and other scholarly sources. El_C 07:31, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Should have been speedy deleted. No content.  RickK 19:57, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Rick. --Scimitar 20:10, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to CLIPS programming language Dunc|&#9786; 20:24, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect as above. Kappa 20:39, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete
 * As above, Redirect. Uncle G 00:16, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
 * Redirect to CLIPS programming language. JamesBurns 05:42, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. CLIPS is the most known and used production system (because it is free of charge and exists for long time) and COOL is attempt to extend its functionality beyond simple if X -> do Y rules. The language has quite different and interesting properties from typical OO languages and IMHO deserves article of its own. The language has extensive documentation and is probably used by majority of serious projects using CLIPS or FuzzyCLIPS. Hopefully someone will add more info the article. Pavel Vozenilek 20:41, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * merge for now, recreate when more info gathered --MarSch 14:59, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .