Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CRITICISM OF CORPORATE FINANCE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

CRITICISM OF CORPORATE FINANCE

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Contested PROD; reason was: violation of WP:NOT and WP:NPOV. Nick—Contact/Contribs 05:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is not a legitimate POV fork as would be the case if the "Criticism" section of Corporate finance had gotten too long and had to be spun off.  This could theoretically be proper subject matter for an article, but (1) not this article, and (2) not done this way.  --Glenfarclas (talk) 07:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a personal essay. J I P  | Talk 14:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. should have been a speedy deletion imo. I mean, the name is in full caps to start with.. --Brunk500 (talk) 15:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: An essay. Joe Chill (talk) 16:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Wikipedia is not a repository for personal essays. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 19:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Weird article, delete as per above DRosin (talk) 21:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essay.  Bye.  JBsupreme (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing but an essay. Should be a snow closure. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like someone's notes. We're not here to be a freebie web-host. Half  Shadow  22:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.