Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSOBS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

CSOBS

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article has been unsourced since Feb 2007. After 15 years, I think a deletion discussion is appropriate. Coin945 (talk) 08:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, the nominator does not propose a valid WP:DEL-REASON. The nominator does not say which notability guideline that this article fails to meet. SailingInABathTub (talk) 10:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete a bunch of unsourced information on something where there is no showing of notability. The burden is on those who want to keep an article to show sources. This is not 1925 Alabama and we have no grandfather clauses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * This seems unnecessarily hyperbolic. PianoDan (talk) 22:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:GNG. PianoDan (talk) 22:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG, not indepth coverage. Sanketio31 (talk) 17:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect, to Operations Support System per WP:CHEAP. Not independently notable. SailingInABathTub (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.