Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSR implementation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 11:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

CSR implementation

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There's already an article on Corporate social responsibility. The implication that this one is specifically about its implementation is illusory as most of the instances of forms of the word "implement" could be removed without changing its meaning. So WP:Content forking seems to apply.

It also isn't an informational piece, providing objective information about CSR implementation, but an advocacy piece giving reasons to establish a CSR program and considerations to keep in mind when doing so. It's a point-of-view piece that doesn't balance disadvantages against the advantages given. WP:SOAPBOX, WP:NOTGUIDE apply.

The final section is informational in form, but it's one arbitrary source's arbitrary and trivial breakdown of a CSR implementation into steps. Largoplazo (talk) 22:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 22:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom -- the article is largely duplicative of what's already in the main CSR article. This content is a worse version of the Implementation section there, and sources do not back up the importance/notability of CSR implementation independent from of CSR itself. Searching for CSR implementation will lead to plenty of results, but for the most part they'd be the kinds of sources one would use in a training manual. I do see some scholarly sources, but I don't have access and I just see a trimmed version of this article as being a WP:NOTDICT/WP:NOTHOWTO violation. Alyo  (chat·edits) 04:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - I don't see the sourcing available to sustain this as an independent article. Merging would be an option if there were material worth merging, but the implementation section in the main article is better than what is here. -- Whpq (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with Non, plus Wikipedia is not a user manual. Expertwikiguy (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.