Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSSTidy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

CSSTidy

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't find any independent sources to show notability.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, Internet,  and Software.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 16:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, another article creation during a time of little scrutiny. Searching reveals almost entirely mirror websites for downloading code and some forum posts, though no independent WP:SIGCOV of the product or anything that would assert notability. Bungle (talk • contribs) 17:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Soft delete maybe? Unable to find significant coverage. Google returns packages downloads or indexed CSS pages that used it mostly. Nothing in either News section. It's mentioned in a lot of books on Google Books but mainly as a passing "This can minify your CSS. Moving on." type of way. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.