Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CS Auxerre Lugoj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 21:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

CS Auxerre Lugoj

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of notability under either GNG or NSports. Of the two sources, one is a dead link and appears it was a list. The other is just a list where they are an entry. Previously deleted. North8000 (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Romania. Shellwood (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – per nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 15:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  17:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Tentative keep. Played in the second highest league of the country's largest sport. Would need to see some sources of course. Maybe the @creator or @one of @these users might know. Geschichte (talk) 20:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep – Per @Geschichte. Third level champion with participation in the second. Svartner (talk) 20:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep – the club played in Romanian second division. Florin (talk) 08:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep – they played for a couple of seasons in the second league, and some of their players went on to play hundreds of games in the first league, and one of them played for the national team of Romania.mihai.zamfir30 09:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * How is that relevant to WP:GNG? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep – the club had some notability in Romania.Rhinen 07:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Who says so? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: There have been newly added content since this article's nomination. Instead of considering this club's reputation, if we could have some source analysis, it might help close this divided discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - An important club from Timiș County AdrianCioran 20:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Which sources confirm this? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Check the 2006-07 Liga II season. AdrianCioran 18:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Enough of a history in the second division and as something of a feeder club to justify an article of its own. Anwegmann (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing to pass the WP:GNG. The keep argument appears to be that the club at its peak reach the second division of Romanian football. This is not in and of itself a showing of notability, and seems to harken back to the NFOOTY days when we tried to assess full professional leagues before the practice was deprecated. The sources present in the article (assuming Google translated them accurately) indicate: (Source 1) The team was founded in 1936, played many years in lower leagues and merged with a another club in 2005. It never reached Division A, but did play for promotion in 2002; they lost. (Source 2) Database listing team standings/match results for 2004/5 season, with no reporting, history or analysis of the team. (Source 3) List of division standings for 2005-6 season (Source 4) What appears to be a newspaper style game story stating that the team lost to another team that was formed 48 hours prior to the match and was missing 5 starters. The story does state that 1500 spectators paid to watch the match, and does engage in some analysis about lack of support and funding for the team affecting their ability to play. (Source 5) List of division standings for 2006-7 season. On their face, sources 2, 3, and 5 count nothing for notability. Source 1 is a 3 sentence capsule summary for a "where are they now" article, and does not constitute WP:SIGCOV. Source 4 potentially could count if the source itself is reliable and independent, which I really cannot assess. Since, at best, there is 1 good source for notability, the article should be deleted. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  01:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per Xymmax Aaron Liu  (talk) 20:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.