Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTH Public Company Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 05:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

CTH Public Company Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORG. Only been on the go since 2009. No notability whatsoever. A simple ISP. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creep 21:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article seems to be promotional. Fevrret (talk) 01:31, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems to have sufficient Thai language sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Famous cable company. Connects to 2.5 million households according to --Lerdsuwa (talk) 13:32, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Also own English Premier League right --Lerdsuwa (talk) 08:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Folk really don't say that companies are really famous, except perhaps Apple. Looking at the sources, No 6 is a private file and is broken; 1 and 2 are index entries at Bloomberg (it's job to provide info to investors, just list the company details with investors); 3 discusses a business partnership with a TV streaming service; 4 is also a partnership deal; 5 is also a partnership announcement. So none of them, closely read, show notability, merely the verification that the company exists, NOT that it is notable. It is simply not notable. It is not even an old established.  scope_creep talk  18:19  6 September  2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 15:48, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment another source from reputable newspaper The Nation (Thailand) indicates that CTH is among the top 2 pay TV operator in Thailand, with TrueVisions at about 2 million viewers and CTH at 2.5 subscribers. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. The company has significantly shaken up the industry in recent years. The Premier League broadcast rights is a big deal and has been covered extensively by the media. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, good deal of source coverage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.