Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CUAS

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (9 delete, 3 valid keep). [[smoddy ]] 17:00, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

CUAS
Campus organizations are not inherently noteable. No relevant Google hits found outside of the Cambridge domain (cam.ac.uk). Delete &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC 19:58:57, 2005-08-24 (UTC)
 * Keep By that logic the set of pages House System at Caltech should also be removed as they refer to organisations that only exist within Caltech. I would also like to point out that CUAS has been around longer than Caltech existed! And there are also non-trivial links referencing CUAS : http://www.winwaed.com/comp/challis/challis_bio.shtml (for example). (unsigned comment by seanbert)
 * The CalTech example is a single page for the entire university, which puts it in a different context than a page about a single organization. I would have no objection to an equivalent page for Cambridge as a whole.  &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC 21:20:23, 2005-08-24 (UTC)


 * Delete. Cambridge University Astronomy Society isn't that notable. I bet this entry is copied straight from the CUSU handbook. David | Talk 20:24, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Having searched Wikipedia's other entires I have found two other Cambridge University societies with entries, Footlights (the comedy society) and the Cambridge Union Society. Both of the student papers also have pages. Bearing this in mind, I feel that it would be inconsistent not to list the astronomy society as well. Alidixon, 21:28 GMT, 24 August 2005.
 * User's third edit.
 * Delete. The Footlights and CUS are famous, CUAS is, sadly, not. Oh, wait, bloody hell, it's just a copyvio from the user page . Nominator should have saved VfD the strain and sent it straight to copyvio. Sdedeo 20:32, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable campus organization. Both above keep votes are sockpuppets or brand-spanking new users created for the purpose of defending Votes for deletion/TINDOMH; see that VfD for more detail. Fernando Rizo T/C 20:33, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Alf I'm happy to have this article. seanbert
 * Delete. Although astronomy groups are cool. -Aranel (" Sarah ") 22:05, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep (changed from reserved) I have re-written and wiked it up a bit, being edit-conflicted by seanbert in the process, sean are you able to verify the founding date - only one site mentioned it. Alf 22:14, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable organization.Amren (talk)  01:52, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd say nn unless info on their stupendous activities that have affected the field is added. :) -- Etacar11   03:09, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. --GraemeL (talk) 10:11, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The content needs some serious revision though, it sounds like an advert. Perhaps listing the famous alumni would justify its inclusion better? (Unsigned vote by, please add votes to bottom of page) -- Etacar11   16:43, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete too many sockpuppets. also not notable. CDC   (talk)  18:14, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable student society. Shimgray 14:25, 28 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.