Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CURURU


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 20:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

CURURU


Irrelevant regional blog hosting service. There's already a mention of it on japanese wikipedia, no sense to have a non-english blog host service listed HERE either. Its also non-notable due to the fact that its just a blog hosting service. timecop 03:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no assertion of notability. So tagged. MER-C 04:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It has an Alexa rank of 4000, so I'd rather get more input first.  --04:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Tiifm 06:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - No valid deletion reason has been provided yet. "CURURU is a major . . ." asserts notability.  Mention on one language's transwiki does not preclude it from being mentioned on any other, and should probably increase the article's merit, as people who are more familiar about the relative prominence of the site (ie, Japanese people) would not simply dismiss the article out of hand. Neier 07:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. If it's notable enough to be on the Japanese Wikipedia, it can be here too. Especially with such an Alexa rank. - Mgm|(talk) 10:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - advertising. hosts blogs, which are non-notable by definition. page is full of strange symbols. - Femmina 20:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment without vote - article is six months obsolete. B.Wind 23:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete unsure on notability. Just H 23:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete- Wikipedia is not an internet directory. Reyk  YO!  10:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.