Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C A Bhavani Devi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

C A Bhavani Devi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable athlete. Has not competed at the Olympics nor has won any medals at any reputable international competitions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I have read and edited the article and removed non-independent, non-reliable sources present in it. I have also removed most autobiographic and biased information that violates the criterion for biographies on living people. Tuscany Cup is a notable tournament in Fencing and from what I gather from the mentioned sources, she looks like a notable sportsperson in India.  Hridith Sudev Nambiar (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep the sources in the article show she has caught the attention of the Indian media so she easily passes WP:GNG. And there is much more to be found: . Note that her name in Tamil is சி. ஏ. பவானி தேவி:, and there are at least 3 pictures of her on Commons: , ... Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 11:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets WP:GNG. Sources are cited in the article. Anup   [Talk]  18:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.