Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C miscellaneous operations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 17:48, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

C miscellaneous operations

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is no such thing as "C miscellaneous operations" in the C standard Library - its maybe WP:OR. The cited material, which is WP:PRIMARY, does not mention miscellaneous operations and it look like the refs just cite some random functions. I have tried to seach for the term, but with no luck. Christian75 (talk) 19:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources necessary to establish notability of this subject as required by WP:GNG.  That's the formal reason.  More to the point, this is just a WP:MADEUP list of random functions.  While it might be appropriate to discuss these routines in the context of a notable subject like the C standard library, there's no evidence to suggest they merit a separate article.  Wikipedia is not a manual.  Msnicki (talk) 20:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge to C standard library. I don't see any potential to develop this into an encyclopedic article. —Ruud 22:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. I'm sole contributor of this article. This article was created only because during a recent reorganization of articles about C standard library I felt a need for gradual transition without completely removing mentions of functions that before had full articles about them. So delete it now, I will merge some bits to relevant articles later. Thanks! 1exec1 (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.