Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cable 7 Television


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Cable 7 Television

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a defunct community television channel in England, resting entirely on a single primary source and written in a surprisingly advertorial tone for something that's defunct. This would quite likely be eligible for a properly written and reliably sourced article, but it doesn't qualify to keep an article that's written and sourced like this. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 04:19, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   18:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I have grave doubts as to whether a defunct community TV station is notable, quite apart from ,the issue of sourcing. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:12, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:BROADCAST "Cable television - Generally, national or regional cable channels are presumed notable. Public access cable stations are not presumed notable unless they serve a major city or a large regional area. For example, a statewide public access channel, or a channel for all of New York City could be presumed notable." Well, Leicester is not London. Besides, there is no coverage, only source in the article is the subject's own (archived) website. Kraxler (talk) 13:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.