Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cable spaghetti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Has been userfied. Marskell 17:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Cable spaghetti

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced, undocumented neologism. Delete per WP:NEO. Chardish 20:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Defintely neologism, and would be more appropriate in a dictionary, not an encyclopedia.Cromdog 21:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blatant violation of WP:NEO.  Cool Blue  Light my Fire! 22:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Userfy - What an interesting article. It would be a shame to lose it, so moving it outside the project space would probably serve best. I've had this kind of thing crop up before, and so have many other computer users out there, so there should be some kind of name for it, even if neologic. Failing userfication, BJAODN.--WaltCip 03:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done ;) - Chardish 05:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :D I won't object to a delete of the article itself.--WaltCip 17:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Interesting and relevant article. ~ Trisreed my talk my contribs 10:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Interesting and relevant article for which there is not enough WP:RS material to write an attributable article on the topic. Thus, the topic does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines and the article cannot meet Wikipedia article policies. But see, What's Next; Promising an end to cable spaghetti. New York Times. September 30, 1999. Group test - Wireless streaming - Multimedia unleashed. Listening to music and watching DVDs anywhere in your home without having to deal with cable spaghetti is now possible. Find out if wireless streaming devices deliver on their promise. Personal Computer World. May 1, 2005. -- Jreferee 05:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.