Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabramatta black dragons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete Gnangarra 06:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Cabramatta black dragons

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Anon-removed Prod. I can't find any sources (reliable or otherwise) for a gang of this name, which is perhaps not surprising when dealing with street gangs in general. Obviously there are notable street gangs, but there's nothing that seems to demonstrate that this particular one is. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If you're making a PR page for a gang, it's not notable.Cantras 15:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for now; if you look at the article 5T, there are some references there that mention the Black Dragons. This is a new article, we should perhaps wait until the authors have finished work on the article before deciding that it has insufficient notability and sources. I'm at least convinced that it isn't a hoax, and that it is a real gang that has attracted the attention of the police and the community. Brianyoumans 21:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That is to say that of the externally-linked websites (the only thing I can access right at the moment), there's a grand total of one Sydney Morning Herald article saying that "Police are aware of another gang calling itself 'Black Dragon'". Nothing much more about what this particular gang does, and I doubt that's even a non-trivial mention. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No Google News Archives for "Cabramatta black dragons" see nor does it currently have any articles on them. ABBSCO's Australia New Zealand database has nothing either. The SMH article that mentions them only contains a passing reference. The photos of the gang markings are pretty dreadful as well. Capitalistroadster 03:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 03:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Cantras. --Mattinbgn/talk 03:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced and because Wikipedia is not a hosting provider of trophy pages. Also delete all of the photos by Special:Contributions/Count45. John Vandenberg 10:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable collection of petty thugs. Lankiveil 11:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete, does not meet any of the relevant content policies or guidelines. Yamaguchi先生 03:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet any of the relevant content policies or guidelines. Yamaguchi先生 03:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.