Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cachaça, Um Amor Brasileiro (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete non-notable book by red-linked author--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Cachaça, Um Amor Brasileiro
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet notability criteria for books. giso6150 (talk) 19:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep This may be because it is not in English, see what you can find from Brazilian websites. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I did search for Portuguese sources before nominating and the only ones that I can find are synopses from bookstore blogs and websites; basically of the type, "We have this in stock and here is a summary from the back cover…" There is no equivalent article in the Portuguese Wikipedia. The author is in neither version of Wikipedia, even as a mention, which is no surprise given that this book (one of two that she has written) has only six copies listed on Worldcat. The original nomination (in 2008) contained claims that there "seemed to be" sources and that the book "has notability in" Brazil, but in eight years the article remains uncited. giso6150 (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. A book that was written and published, like millions of others. And I'm with Giso6150 regarding search results. Victão Lopes  Fala! 16:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as my searches are not finding anything better. SwisterTwister   talk  05:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.