Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cachiche


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Cachiche

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No references, unclear notability, possibly WP:OR Veryhuman (talk) 23:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Cachiche really is the name of a town in Peru. So, if all towns are notable, do we Keep? Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 02:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not only is it a separated populated place, but it seems to have received some coverage, primarily due to its witch folklore. --Oakshade (talk) 04:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's about witches, not the town itself  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral. The article as it currently exists does not belong on Wikipedia. However, an article about the town itself would. I think this needs to be stubified and re-written by someone who can find some good sources. The subject of the town and its relationship with witchcraft would probably merit a small mention but not be the predominant focus of the article.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:47, 18 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Keep and stubbify per Tokyogirl79. If anyone wants to see the place, it's here: -14.095°N, -75.736°W. Deor (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Thanks Oakshade, Tokyogirl79 and Deor. am adding a few details you noted to the article. Page has significantly changed since addition of delete tag, so I'd say Keep now. Veryhuman (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Any issues identified above can be fixed by editing rather than deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:36, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Fix and Keep: Seems to pass geographical notability guidelines  Purpleback pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  02:17, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.