Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cacilda Borges Barbosa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   withdrawn   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 19:54, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Cacilda Borges Barbosa

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Stub since creation in 2007, single reference appears to be her homepage, notability not fully established Jubilee♫ clipman 04:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * She's got a biography in the New Grove, so strong keep. It's a short article, but that's notability.  Cheers, Antandrus  (talk) 04:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Antandrus; see also her entry in this Portuguese online encyclopedia. Chubbles (talk) 04:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Per WP:BEFORE, please check the existence of the other wikipedia before proposing a delete.  The Portuguese language article is longer than this one and contains more references; consider that your energy might be better spent marking the article for improved translation rather than suggesting a delete.  Edward Vielmetti (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Suggesting that the nominator knew the article would benefit from improved translation and deliberately suggested deletion anyway doesn't quite AGF, does it? Let's chalk this one up to a minor mistake.  It's not like someone nominated Mozart for deletion here.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 05:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment - I nominated a small batch of these while reviewing List of 21st-century classical composers (mainly checking for mis-links to footballers etc). I also PRODed a few.  I felt there was a strong case for each, but due to the fact I was going through a huge list (still am) I never fully checked them all out.  That was indeed a mistake due to inexperience (I am only 15 months old on Wiki).  I will copy the titles into notepad from now on and check each carefully when I get time before deciding what to do.  Experience is only a good thing even if it is the result of a major screw up!  --Jubilee♫ clipman  06:39, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This batch of articles have been long neglected so it's good that we give them an airing. Although in this case, I have said 'strong keep', leaving substandard articles on WP doesn't benefit anybody however notable the subjects. -- Klein zach  00:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Very weak delete due to the fact that this article doesn't really assert its own notability and this isn't verifiable by readers. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► presiding officer ─╢ 09:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, but only if the article can be improved with references. The Portuguese WP article is a little more substantial, but still poorly sourced.  --Deskford (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per Antandrus. Portugese is often a problem for us . . . neverthless it really would be good if someone could work on the article. Perhaps we should request help from a Portugese speaker? -- Klein  zach  00:09, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I've put a request on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brazil to see if any Portuguese speakers can come to the rescue. --Deskford (talk) 00:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * NB: Withdraw AfD: improve article with translation from portuguese article and source further as suggested above from Grove et al. --Jubilee♫ clipman  00:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.