Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cacofiend


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was '''merge. Since there's some disagreement on where to merge (Arny makes good points), I've slapped three different merge tags on the article page. You guys can work out a consensus on what to do privately'''. Johnleemk | Talk 15:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Cacofiend
An article about a move ("spell") in a video game. No hint of notability, unlikely to expand. Harr o 5 07:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Baldur's Gate 2 -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 07:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I've created this article not primarily for the spell itself, but for the creature the spell calls, and which is named exactly the same, and inspired by the Cacodemon article. I can simply rearrange the sentences to reflect that if you wish, and Keep the article. BTW, I'm not sure if it should be merged with BG2 article, because there may be other games based on the D&D ruleset which may also use the same spell, but I am unaware of that. If the consensus would be to merge, I'd suggest to Merge it to Cacodemon or Fiend (Dungeons & Dragons) whichever seems more appropriate. There are other "fiends" described there, so this one could fit too. Instead of jumping to delete this article, the more constuctive thing would be to give some help with it, wouldn't it? (See also Talk:Cacofiend) I made this a stub because I wasn't sure where to put it. I sure was hoping someone would eventually put that info where it belongs if it doesn't deserve its own article, not erase it completely! Not very nice... --Arny 07:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge --Masssiveego 08:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per TBC  Wh e  re  (talk)  Clarify T1-reduce wikiStrife 00:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.