Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadburys Tempo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 11:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Cadburys Tempo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 10:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * I suggest you read User:Stifle/Don't say non-notable, sir. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  13:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - but needs some improvement and expansion. Deb (talk) 11:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. A real product just the same as Kit-Kat and Snickers and they have an article each. It is the bones of an article, leave it and see if someone can flesh it out. Trevor Marron (talk) 00:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep If it received enough coverage in sources outside the company, the article can be expanded. Otherwise, it's a useful redirect to the company article. Either way, a deletion, especially one with no rationale provided, is not the best way to go. - Mgm|(talk) 09:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.