Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadence Goes To The Library


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Cadence Goes To The Library

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Book published last year; the only thing it's notable for is that it's written by a 6-year-old. No third-party references, very few Google hits. (The external links are: the Facebook page of the author, and a magazine which does mention the book in a 2-sentence "review"/blog entry .) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: vanity press. Czolgolz (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - No signs of notability. Beyond the Moon Magazine doesn't appear reliable at all. Grayfell (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's wonderful that someone so young has written and published a book (regardless of whether or not it's vanity or self-published), but ultimately there just isn't anything out there that would establish notability per WP:NBOOK. I wish her well, but right now this is just WP:TOOSOON for her work to have an entry. Since it's likely that the young lady or someone in her family is reading this, I'd like to ask that they not take this poorly - it's very, very difficult for most books to gain an entry on Wikipedia and we have books put out by very, very well known people that don't pass NBOOK. Shucks, I've even seen books land on national bestseller lists that have failed NBOOK. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.