Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Cadio

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Article reads as spam and is not notable. It was tagged as speedy until the article creator removed that tag (apparently. either that or the article was previously deleted then recreated. I AGF here and assumed the latter). I then prodded for that reason. Article creator removed the prod without any indication on the talk page. CaveatLector Talk Contrib 17:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The things you learn searchin' the web: people can't spell the word cardio, George Sand wrote a work named "Cadio", and there is a Philippine entrepreneur that promotes his/her technology using a scanned image of a 9 year-old Manila Bulletin article. All joking aside, Cadio is certainly not notable per WP:CORP. FWIW, here is the authoritative web site. (If you are into obscure tech products such as this there is a semi-interesting history here... but "interesting" does, of course, not mean notable.) &mdash;Noah 08:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Hi CaveatLector. Yes, you are right, it was deleted before.  I never complained about the deletion of my article because I don't have yet my references. I don't know how to put links to it. Now, having these references, I could come up with a petition. If you will delete this article, then what's the point of having a legal reference. Meaning, the reference does not only pertains to the book's content but shows a certificate of copyright registration and deposit in the Philippines. Hi ChildofMidnight.  That's not a problem, then tell me how it can be a sufficient notability. Hi Noah_Salzman. The site that you are referring to is where I got the reference of cadio.  I can put a link on it and make that website as one of the references.  You did a great research Noah and I appreciate it. User:Andygold7 10:07 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Negligible notability. Tim Ross   (talk)  22:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Tim Ross. You are giving a comment without explaining your point.  Can you give a more precise explanation on the issue. User:Andygold7 8:40 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Andygold, please make sure to only use a bolded statement (such as "Keep") once. If you're confused about something, use Comment. CaveatLector Talk Contrib 02:14, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.