Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadogan, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  22:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Cadogan, California

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:V in that the two sources given are not - per 100+ AFD discussions - good enough to establish verifiability on their own. Having a post office for only a year doesn't sound like a real post office. Geschichte (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete there is no actual indication that this place fits notability guidelines. The goal of becoming a gazeteer maybe should have been thought out better before we undertook it without tight controls on what places we would allow. This has lead to articles on places that were never more than one residence in California while we lack articles on places with thosands of residents in Nigeria and Congo.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per precedent for other Durham-only articles. There's possibly some hope of verifying the post office name, but in itself that's not notable, and especially not for one that existed so briefly. Mangoe (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.