Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caesarean text-type

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP The Land 19:32, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Caesarean text-type
The title says nothing about the article - the article fails to explain the title. Delete as jibberjabber. Eddie.willers 03:40, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Clean up to the same level of quality as Byzantine text-type or Alexandrian text-type. Pburka 03:50, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * OK, a clean up to that kind of standard would be preferable to deletion. Grudgingly. Eddie.willers 03:56, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, presumably rewarding to anyone who knew what it was and looked it up. Kappa 10:16, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Has scholarly value. Denni &#9775; 01:06, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I cleaned it up a little and added some context (still a little stubby)...I couldn't make heads or tails of it before but it's a real Bible topic. If anyone is familar with this please add! Rx StrangeLove 22:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep ··gracefool |&#9786; 18:55, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.