Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage (BDSM)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Cage (BDSM)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Reads like advert. No sources. Does not meet GNG. Stillwaterising (talk) 13:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  —Stillwaterising (talk) 13:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - the use of cages in BDSM should be, without giving it undue weight compared to other uses, covered by cage (enclosure), which is suprisingly short and uncited.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 13:55, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable on its own terms. No sources, either. Joal Beal (talk) 19:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.