Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cahiers du Cinéma's Top 10


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cahiers du cinéma.  Sandstein  08:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Cahiers du Cinéma's Top 10

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

List of Top Tens by who? No indication of notability or source. The Banner talk 22:04, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment "Cahiers du cinéma" seems to be Cahiers du cinéma, a French film magazine. Natg 19 (talk) 22:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 22:08, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge to Cahiers du cinéma. This seems to be fitting for target article which isn't currently too long and the French WP article has this list included in it. --Oakshade (talk) 03:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  17:02, 7 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep with changes. This is an appropriately scoped set index list (actually a list of lists).  The publisher of the content is a notable magazine; there is a source for the content (IMDB); and the content provides a particular structured viewpoint for otherwise unrelated films.  The two changes which fall into AfD scope is to better reference the content by converting the external link to a proper citation and to create a lead section. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 17:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:33, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cahiers du cinéma with a collapsible list, as it provides better context, per WP:NOPAGE. Esquivalience t 16:53, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.