Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cahir O'Higgins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Cahir O'Higgins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not Notable appears to be self bio Dermo345 (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Appears to not satisfy WP:NOTABILITY. Appears to be a WP:AB.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete not enough 3rd party reliable secondary source coverage to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * This article is fair and accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.233.35.53 (talk) 10:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. First off, he fails my standards for lawyers. All of his work essentially has been paid; lawyers are expected to do pro bono and to be involved in bar association work to be notable. Secondly, getting three reported cases is not unusual. I argued two appellate cases and was on the brief as a law clerk on a third. Lawyers are supposed to argue cases. That does not make them notable. Secondly, his primary claim to notability is via his parents. Finally, in 2020, everybody knows we are a charity, not the Irish LinkedIn. Bearian (talk) 21:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.