Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caillou (franchise)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Caillou (franchise)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unreferenced "franchise" article of unclear necessity. This consists of a single sentence stating that this is a franchise that exists, the end, and its only "reference" was an invalid WP:CIRCULAR link to the Wikipedia article about the series which constitutes the most notable iteration of the franchise -- but references must be external to Wikipedia, so that wasn't a legitimate reference and had to be stripped. This would be fine if the article actually contained any real substance and sourcing, but there's absolutely nothing here that isn't already contained in the existing article about Caillou as it is, making this just a content fork with no pressing need to have a standalone article in this form separately from the content we already have in other places. Bearcat (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation,  and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Delete. Not needed since the main article on the Caillou show is good enough as is and does not seem big enough to have a separate one for the whole series. Nintendoswitchfan (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify This is clearly not ready for mainspace but there is some Caillou media and merch outside of the TV series so I think a franchise article could a decent idea.★Trekker (talk) 11:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - zero notability. No point in draftifying a single sentence. Onel 5969  TT me 14:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.