Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cailyn Huston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Cailyn Huston

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No assertion of notability. A blogger and community organizer for a project conceived by someone else (Huston is mentioned at the project's site, but not in any of the project's news coverage). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. On the face of it, this is a blogger who was associated with a project that might be the subject of a Wikipedia article, but whatever notability is there is not inheritable.  I tested the references and agree with the nominator; there is no assertion of notability and I found nothing to make me believe that there's anything to back up such an assertion.  Ubelowme (talk) 19:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources listed within the article are not written about the subject being discussed for deletion, no assertion of notability is provided.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I contributed this entry, and I'm a little confused why she isn't considered notable enough. She is a blogger on her own personal blog (which I understand is not notable), but she's also a weekly contributor to a larger website where she has built a following. I added the information about her work with the Snail Mail My Email project because I was one of the volunteers who worked under her; she was very heavily involved in the project even though it was conceived by someone else. CleverLittleFox 15:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The criteria at WP:BIO are pretty clear. CleverLittleFox is invited to review them and point out how the subject specifically meets any of them.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.