Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caimeiju


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Caimeiju

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not seeing sufficient coverage to justify a page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, trivial mentions in a few sources. Brandmeistertalk  12:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH -- HighKing ++ 15:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Suggestion for proper Afc process should be given. The only reference that seems to defend keeping the article is reference 2. Possible scope of development should be added to the talk page. If page is not retained, the draft can be retained and further development sought. Zombalu (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sock !vote above has been struck. Lepricavark (talk) 19:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. so little evidwence of possible notability that it could have been an A7 speedy.  DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly the work of a paid editor, despite their denials. I hope they don't charge much. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:08, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete :D Fails ORG and WEB.  Lourdes  05:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.