Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cain's Lair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Punkmorten 14:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Cain's Lair

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:WEB, WP:V and asserts no claim to notability. I bring this to AfD because I felt it didn't fall under CSD and that a prod would be contested. BJ Talk 12:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no real assertion of notability. - Richardcavell 23:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Kungfu Adam  ( talk ) 16:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 16:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. John Vandenberg 14:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,  Nish kid 64  01:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - 99 Ghits for "Cain's Lair" Battlefield - and please forgive for stopping after the fourth page, but they all seem to be generated from the site itself, forum references, and very few blog references - you know it's bad when not even the blogs are talking about it. On top of that, the article is a POV nightmare, full of unsourced spammish claims. Despite an unusually long listing here at AfD, nothing has been done to improve this article. -- Antepenultimate 02:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete if no one has bothered in two weeks of AfD to clean this mess up, it certainly won't ever happen. In any case, with an average of 100 or so players connected at any given time, it's most definitely not worthy of note. Pascal.Tesson 03:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing to pass WP:WEB notability test. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 12:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Terence Ong 13:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.