Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin C. Rosenthal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as WP:TOOSOON. bd2412 T 04:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Caitlin C. Rosenthal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An assistance professor with only one book in publication - fails WP:NPROF



 CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as far WP:Too soon. Assistant professors are usually not notable and this is no exception. Tiny citations on GS do not pass WP:Prof and lack of independent in-depth sources fails WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC).
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 11:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Citation counts are not particularly relevant for this subject but one new book with only one review that I could find in a quick search is not enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NPROF. --<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS',Geneva,sans-serif"> qedk ( t  桜  c ) 11:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON, wait for some more publications.___<em style="font-family:grafolitascript;color:#aa6ef4">CAPTAIN MEDUSA <em style="font-family:grafolitascript;color:#000000">talk   12:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with previous editors about WP:TOOSOON. An assistant professor with few citations, it's hard to see that she meets any WP notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 00:20, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.